Calories Burned Calculator

Estimate the calories you burn during exercise from the activity, your weight and the duration. Free, instant, no signup.

How to use the Calories Burned Calculator

  1. Enter your values. Fill in the fields with your numbers.
  2. Calculate. Press Calculate to run the calories burned calculator.
  3. Use the result. Copy the result or try a related tool next.

Why use our Calories Burned Calculator

Instant results. Enter your figures and the calories burned calculator returns an answer in seconds.
Free & private. Runs in your browser — no signup, and nothing is sent to a server.
Accurate. Uses standard formulas so you can rely on the numbers.

Free to use — premium coming soon

FREE
  • Unlimited calculations
  • Instant results
  • No signup
PREMIUM
  • Remove ads
  • Save & compare scenarios
  • Export results

About the Calories Burned Calculator

The Calories Burned Calculator estimates how much energy your body uses during a specific physical activity, based on your body weight, the type of exercise, and how long you do it. Instead of guessing whether a 45-minute walk or a 30-minute cycling session burned more, you get a concrete kcal figure you can plan around. It is built for anyone tracking energy balance, from people managing weight and runners logging training load to general exercisers who simply want to know whether a workout earned the calories they think it did.

Use it whenever you want to put a number on movement: comparing two workouts, deciding how long to exercise to offset a meal, or estimating a weekly activity total to pair with a daily calorie target. It is most useful as a planning and comparison tool rather than a precise tracker, because it gives consistent, repeatable estimates that let you weigh one activity against another on the same basis. Athletes use it to gauge training expenditure, and people in a calorie deficit use it to sanity-check the 'calories out' side of the equation.

Under the hood it uses the MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) method, the same approach published in exercise-science reference tables. One MET is your energy cost at rest, roughly 1 kcal per kilogram of body weight per hour. Each activity has a MET value scaled to that baseline, so the calculation is simply Calories = MET x body weight (kg) x duration (hours). A 70 kg person walking briskly at a 3.5 MET pace for one hour burns about 3.5 x 70 x 1 = 245 kcal. Heavier bodies and higher-intensity activities both push the number up.

Treat the result as a solid estimate, not a measured fact. MET-based figures are typically within 10 to 20 percent of true expenditure because they use population averages and do not account for your age, sex, fitness level, body composition, terrain, or movement efficiency. They are actually more consistent than wrist-worn trackers, which research has shown can be off by 27 percent or more on calories. The calculation runs entirely in your browser using a standard formula and stored MET values, so your weight and activity details are never sent to a server or saved anywhere.

Frequently asked questions

What formula does the calculator use?

It uses the metabolic equivalent method: Calories = MET x body weight in kilograms x duration in hours. Each activity has a MET value that represents how many times more energy it costs than resting, where 1 MET is roughly 1 kcal per kilogram per hour.

How accurate are the results?

MET-based estimates are usually within 10 to 20 percent of your actual calorie burn. They rely on population averages and do not adjust for your age, sex, fitness level, or terrain, so use the number as a reliable comparison and planning figure rather than an exact reading.

Why does my body weight change the result so much?

Calorie burn scales directly with body weight in the MET formula, because moving a heavier body requires more energy. Doing the same activity for the same time, a 90 kg person will burn noticeably more calories than a 60 kg person.

Is this more or less accurate than my fitness tracker?

It is often more consistent. Studies have found wrist-worn trackers can misestimate calories burned by 27 percent or more because they infer expenditure from heart rate and motion. The MET method gives a steady, repeatable estimate, though neither replaces lab-grade measurement.

Does it count the calories I would have burned anyway at rest?

Yes. The MET method includes your resting expenditure for that period, so the figure is gross calories burned during the activity, not the extra calories above resting. To get the 'net' burn, subtract roughly your resting rate for the same duration.

From our blog

How to Read Your Pregnancy Weight Gain Calculator Result the Right Way

By the Super Simple Digital Tools Team · Updated June 2026

The first thing to understand about any pregnancy weight gain calculator is that it answers a different question than most people expect. It does not tell you what you weigh or what you should weigh today in isolation. Instead it estimates how much additional weight is healthy to add over the whole pregnancy, starting from the body you had before conception. That is why two people who currently weigh the same can get very different targets: the math keys off pre-pregnancy BMI, not current weight.

Those targets come from the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines, which sort pre-pregnancy BMI into four bands. Underweight pregnancies are advised to gain the most, about 28 to 40 lb, because a low starting reserve raises the risk of a small or premature baby. Normal-BMI pregnancies aim for 25 to 35 lb, overweight for 15 to 25 lb, and obese for 11 to 20 lb. The logic is a balance: enough gain to nourish the baby, not so much that it adds avoidable risk for the parent. The calculator simply automates looking up the right row.

Timing matters as much as the total. Very little gain is expected in the first trimester, often just 1 to 4 lb, partly because nausea can suppress appetite. The bulk arrives later, at roughly half a pound to a pound a week through the second and third trimesters for a normal starting BMI. If a tool shows a by-week target, it is spreading the total across that pattern, which is why being slightly behind early on is usually nothing to worry about while a sudden jump later might be worth mentioning to your provider.

It helps to know what the gain is actually made of, because the number on the scale is not all fat. By late pregnancy the total includes the baby, the placenta, amniotic fluid, extra blood and tissue fluid, a larger uterus and breasts, and some maternal fat stores for breastfeeding. This is why short-term swings, especially from fluid retention, can make a single weigh-in misleading. Trends across several weeks tell a far more honest story than any one measurement the calculator compares against.

Finally, use the result as a conversation starter, not a verdict. The IOM ranges are averages built for whole populations and cannot see your medical history, a multiple pregnancy beyond twins, gestational diabetes, or your clinician's individualized plan. If your real gain sits outside the suggested range, that is a cue to ask why at your next appointment rather than to crash-diet or overeat. The calculator's job is to give you a clear, private starting estimate so that conversation is better informed.

  • Enter your pre-pregnancy weight, not today's weight, since the BMI category that drives the whole result is based on your starting point.
  • Double-check your height and weight units before reading the range, because a mix-up between pounds and kilograms throws off the BMI band entirely.
  • Switch on the twins setting if you are carrying multiples; the singleton ranges will under-target a twin pregnancy by 10 lb or more.
  • Compare your gain over several weeks rather than reacting to one weigh-in, since fluid shifts can swing the scale without changing your real trend.

Read the full guide →

Tool by the Super Simple Digital Tools Team. Reviewed by our editorial team. Free to use, no signup required.

Related tools