Password Strength Tester

Check how strong a password is — entropy, rating and actionable feedback, all computed in your browser.

Testing happens entirely in your browser — the password is never transmitted or stored.

How to use the Password Strength Tester

  1. Type a password. Enter or paste the password you want to evaluate into the box.
  2. Read the rating. See its strength rating, entropy in bits, and which character types it uses.
  3. Act on the tips. Follow the feedback to strengthen it — or generate a strong one with our Password Generator.

Why use our Password Strength Tester

Instant, private analysis. Strength updates as you type and never leaves your browser — safe to test real passwords.
Entropy in bits. See the estimated entropy, the single best measure of how hard a password is to brute-force.
Clear, actionable tips. Get specific suggestions — add length, mix character types, avoid common passwords.
Common-password check. Flags passwords found on the most-used-password lists that attackers try first.

Free to use — premium coming soon

FREE
  • Unlimited tests
  • Entropy & strength rating
  • Improvement feedback
  • Common-password detection
PREMIUM
  • Remove ads
  • Breach-database lookup
  • Bulk password auditing

About the Password Strength Tester

The Password Strength Tester estimates how resistant a password is to guessing and brute-force attacks, then gives you a clear rating and feedback you can act on. Instead of just counting whether you used an uppercase letter or a digit, it looks at the password the way a real attacker would: it flags dictionary words, common passwords, keyboard runs like 'qwerty', sequences like '1234', repeated characters, dates, and predictable letter-for-symbol swaps (such as 'p@ssw0rd'). The result is a more honest picture of risk than a meter that simply rewards adding a '!' to the end of a weak word.

Use it whenever you are about to set or change an important password, especially for email, banking, cloud storage, or a password manager's master password. It is also handy for sanity-checking a passphrase before you commit it to memory, or for teaching family members and coworkers why 'Summer2025!' is weaker than it looks. Because it explains its reasoning, the tool doubles as a learning aid: you can watch the rating jump as you add length, swap a common word for random ones, or break up an obvious pattern.

Under the hood the tester combines two ideas. First, it estimates entropy, the measure of unpredictability in bits, roughly from how large the character set is and how long the password is (entropy grows with length far faster than with added symbols). Second, it penalizes patterns: a long password that is really a known phrase or a keyboard walk is scored down because attackers try those guesses first. The combined score maps to a label such as Weak, Fair, Strong, or Very Strong, often alongside a rough time-to-crack figure for context.

On privacy: this tool runs entirely in your browser. Your password is never sent to our servers, logged, or stored, and nothing leaves the page. That said, treat any time-to-crack number as a ballpark, not a guarantee. Independent research has shown the same password can be rated wildly differently across tools (in one study, estimates for one password ranged from about a minute to billions of years), because results depend on the attacker model assumed. Use the rating to compare options and catch obvious weaknesses, not as proof a password is unbreakable.

Frequently asked questions

Is it safe to type my real password into this tester?

Yes. The check runs locally in your browser using JavaScript, so the password is never transmitted to a server, logged, or saved. As a habit, though, it is best to test the kind of password you plan to use rather than one already protecting a live account.

Why is my long password still rated weak?

Length alone is not enough if the password is predictable. A long string that is a dictionary word, a name, a date, a keyboard pattern like 'qwertyuiop', or a common phrase gets penalized because attackers guess those first. Mix unrelated words or random characters to raise the score.

How accurate is the time-to-crack estimate?

Treat it as a rough comparison, not a promise. The figure depends on assumptions about the attacker's hardware and method, so different tools can disagree by orders of magnitude for the same password. Use it to tell weak passwords from strong ones, not to declare a password uncrackable.

What does password entropy mean?

Entropy measures unpredictability in bits: each extra bit roughly doubles the number of guesses needed. As a rough guide, aim for 60 or more bits for everyday accounts and 80 or more for sensitive ones like email, banking, or a password manager master password.

Is a passphrase better than a complex short password?

Usually, yes. Current NIST guidance favors length over forced complexity and recommends allowing passphrases up to 64 characters. Four or more unrelated random words are easy to remember and hard to crack, often beating a short string of mixed symbols.

From our blog

From JSON to YAML Without Breaking Your Config: A Practical Guide

By the Super Simple Digital Tools Team · Updated June 2026

JSON and YAML are two ways of writing the same thing. Under the hood both encode a tree of mappings (key-value pairs), sequences (lists), and scalar values like strings, numbers, booleans and null. That shared model is why conversion is reliable: there is no information in well-formed JSON that YAML cannot represent. What changes is the surface syntax. JSON marks structure with braces, brackets, commas and quotes; YAML marks it with indentation and dashes. Strip the punctuation, indent consistently, and a dense JSON object becomes a YAML file you can scan top to bottom like a checklist.

So why bother, if a system accepts both? Because YAML won the configuration ecosystem. Kubernetes manifests, Helm charts, Docker Compose, GitHub Actions and GitLab CI pipelines, and Ansible playbooks are all written in YAML by convention. The big reasons are human ones: YAML files have less syntactic noise, nest more readably, and crucially support comments, something JSON flatly refuses. When a deployment file is edited by people during incidents, being able to annotate why a value is set the way it is matters more than raw parsing speed. JSON still dominates APIs and machine-to-machine data exchange, which is exactly where the conversion need arises.

The single biggest gotcha in YAML is indentation, because indentation is not cosmetic, it is the structure. There are no closing braces to fall back on, so one extra or missing space can silently move a key to the wrong nesting level or invalidate the file. The cardinal rule: never use tabs. The YAML spec forbids tab characters for indentation, and mixing tabs with spaces, often introduced by copy-pasting from a terminal or documentation, is one of the fastest ways to produce a file that looks fine but won't parse. Pick two spaces per level and stay consistent throughout.

The second classic trap is implicit typing. YAML tries to infer whether a bare value is a string, number or boolean. Under the still-common YAML 1.1 rules, words like yes, no, on, off, true and false (in many capitalisations) all become booleans, which is how the Norway problem got its name: the country code NO parses as the boolean false. Leading-zero values like 0755 or version-looking strings can also be coerced unexpectedly. The fix is simple and is why a good converter quotes proactively: wrap any value whose textual meaning matters in quotes so the parser treats it as a literal string.

A sensible workflow, then, is convert, scan, validate. Convert the JSON to get clean block-style YAML. Scan the output for any values that should be strings but were left bare, and confirm the indentation depth matches where the snippet will live in a larger file. Then run it through a YAML linter or the target tool's dry-run mode before committing. Because the conversion is lossless, anything that breaks afterwards is almost always one of the two YAML-specific issues, indentation or implicit typing, not the data itself.

  • Use two spaces per indentation level and never tabs; configure your editor to insert spaces on Tab so pasted YAML stays parseable.
  • After converting, check that values like NO, yes, off, or numbers with leading zeros are quoted if you meant them as strings, to dodge YAML's implicit-typing traps.
  • When pasting converted YAML into a Kubernetes or CI file, re-indent the whole block so its top level lines up with its parent key rather than the file's left margin.
  • Run the output through a YAML linter or your tool's dry-run (for example kubectl apply --dry-run) before committing, since YAML errors often hide in invisible whitespace.

Read the full guide →

Tool by the Super Simple Digital Tools Team. Reviewed by our editorial team. Free to use, no signup required.

Related tools