Waist to Hip Ratio Calculator

Calculate your waist-to-hip ratio and assess your cardiovascular health risk as low, moderate, or high. Free, instant, no signup.

Formula: WHR = waist circumference ÷ hip circumference

How to use the Waist to Hip Ratio Calculator

  1. Enter your values. Fill in the fields with your numbers.
  2. Calculate. Press Calculate to run the waist to hip ratio calculator.
  3. Use the result. Copy the result or try a related tool next.

Why use our Waist to Hip Ratio Calculator

Instant results. Enter your figures and the waist to hip ratio calculator returns an answer in seconds.
Free & private. Runs in your browser — no signup, and nothing is sent to a server.
Accurate. Uses standard formulas so you can rely on the numbers.

Free to use — premium coming soon

FREE
  • Unlimited calculations
  • Instant results
  • No signup
PREMIUM
  • Remove ads
  • Save & compare scenarios
  • Export results

About the Waist to Hip Ratio Calculator

The Waist to Hip Ratio Calculator divides your waist circumference by your hip circumference to estimate how your body fat is distributed. Enter both measurements in the same unit (centimetres or inches) and the tool returns a single decimal, plus the World Health Organization risk band that matches it. The arithmetic is simple, WHR = waist / hip, so a 71 cm waist and 89 cm hips give 0.80. What makes the number useful is that it focuses on abdominal fat, the type most strongly linked to cardiovascular and metabolic problems, rather than overall weight the way BMI does.

Use this calculator when you want a quick, equipment-light check on health risk that BMI alone can miss. Because it compares two measurements taken at the same body, it stays meaningful even if you are muscular or carry weight that a height-and-weight formula would flag misleadingly. People commonly run it alongside BMI before a doctor's visit, while tracking changes during a fitness programme, or simply to understand whether they tend toward an apple shape (fat around the middle) or a pear shape (fat around the hips). It is a screening signal, not a diagnosis.

Accuracy depends almost entirely on how you measure. Wrap a flexible tape around the narrowest part of your torso, roughly level with or just above the navel, keeping it snug but not compressing the skin, and measure on a normal exhale without sucking in. For hips, find the widest part of the buttocks and keep the tape horizontal all the way around. Measure twice and average the readings. The calculator then applies WHO cut-offs: for men, 0.90 or below is lower risk and above is elevated; for women the threshold is 0.85.

Everything in this tool runs locally in your browser. Your waist and hip figures are used only to compute the ratio and its risk band on your own device, are never uploaded to a server, and disappear when you close or refresh the page. That makes it safe to use for personal health checks without creating an account or sharing data. Keep in mind it is a general guide: WHR is unreliable during pregnancy, for children, for people under about five feet tall, and at very high BMI, so treat any elevated result as a prompt to speak with a healthcare professional rather than a conclusion.

Frequently asked questions

What waist to hip ratio is considered healthy?

The World Health Organization considers a ratio of 0.90 or below lower risk for men and 0.85 or below lower risk for women. Ratios above these cut-offs indicate more abdominal fat and a greater risk of conditions like heart disease and type 2 diabetes.

Where exactly should I measure my waist and hips?

Measure the waist at its narrowest point, usually level with or just above the belly button, on a normal breath out. Measure the hips at the widest part of the buttocks, keeping the tape horizontal. Use the same unit for both and measure twice for accuracy.

Does it matter whether I use inches or centimetres?

No. Because the calculator divides one measurement by the other, the units cancel out, so the ratio is the same as long as you use the same unit for both waist and hips.

Is waist to hip ratio better than BMI?

They measure different things. BMI estimates overall body weight relative to height, while WHR specifically reflects where fat is stored. WHR can flag abdominal-fat risk that BMI misses, so many people use the two together rather than choosing one.

Who should not rely on this calculator?

WHR is not suitable during pregnancy or for children, and it loses accuracy for people under roughly five feet tall or with a very high BMI (around 35 or above). In those cases, ask a healthcare professional for a more appropriate assessment.

From our blog

Body Surface Area Explained: How One Number Scales Doses, Hearts, and Kidneys

By the Super Simple Digital Tools Team · Updated June 2026

Body surface area sounds abstract, but it is one of the most quietly important numbers in medicine. Rather than treating every patient as a fixed weight, BSA expresses how big a person is in a way that lines up with how their body handles drugs and fluids. That single square-metre figure becomes the denominator for medication doses, the reference for heart performance, and the yardstick for kidney function. Understanding it helps you read your own lab reports and check whether a calculated value is in a sensible range.

The formulas themselves date back over a century. In 1916, Du Bois and Du Bois published BSA = 0.007184 x height^0.725 x weight^0.425 based on careful measurements of a small group of people. Decades later, Mosteller offered a far simpler version, the square root of height times weight divided by 3600, that is easy to do on a basic calculator and matches the older formula closely. Haycock and Gehan-George later added refinements, especially for children. This calculator implements these published equations so you get the same answer a clinician would.

The most common real-world use is dosing powerful drugs. Chemotherapy agents are frequently prescribed as a dose per square metre, so a regimen of, say, 100 mg/m2 means a patient with a BSA of 1.8 m2 receives 180 mg. The logic is that surface area tracks metabolic mass better than weight, which can be skewed by fat that does not metabolise the drug. The approach has known limitations and is debated, but it remains standard practice for standardising exposure and limiting toxicity.

BSA also shows up in cardiology and nephrology. Cardiac output is divided by BSA to give the cardiac index, normally between 2.5 and 4.0 litres per minute per square metre, so a big person and a small person can be compared fairly. Estimated kidney filtration rate (eGFR) on a routine blood test is normalised to a standard 1.73 m2 body, a value chosen in the early twentieth century as the average BSA of a typical adult. When you see those numbers, BSA is working behind the scenes.

For everyday purposes, treat the result as a solid estimate rather than a precise physical measurement. The formulas were fitted to limited samples and assume reasonably average body proportions, so they are least reliable at the extremes. Use the calculator to learn, to sanity-check a figure, or to follow along with a textbook problem, and always defer to a qualified professional and validated clinical tools for anything that affects actual treatment.

  • Use the Mosteller result for quick checks; it needs only a square root and matches the more complex Du Bois formula within a few percent for most adults.
  • Convert feet, inches, and pounds to centimetres and kilograms before entering them, since the underlying equations are metric and reported in square metres.
  • To estimate a per-square-metre drug dose, multiply the listed mg/m2 by your BSA, then confirm the figure with a pharmacist or clinician rather than self-dosing.
  • When indexing cardiac output or kidney function, remember eGFR is already normalised to 1.73 m2, so you do not divide it by BSA a second time.

Read the full guide →

Tool by the Super Simple Digital Tools Team. Reviewed by our editorial team. Free to use, no signup required.

Related tools