Inch-Pounds to Foot-Pounds

Convert inch-pounds to foot-pounds instantly, with a full reference table.

Inch-pounds to Foot-pounds (torque) conversion table
Inch-pounds (in·lb)Foot-pounds (torque) (ft·lb)
121
242
363
484
605
726
847
968
1089
12010
Formula: One inch-pound equals 0.0833333 foot-pounds. To convert inch-pounds to foot-pounds, multiply by 0.0833333, or equivalently divide by 12.

Free to use — premium coming soon

FREE
  • Instant conversion
  • Reference table
  • Reverse direction
PREMIUM
  • Remove ads
  • Custom table ranges
  • Bulk conversions

About the Inch-Pounds to Foot-Pounds

The Inch-Pounds to Foot-Pounds converter turns a torque or energy figure given in inch-pounds (in-lb, also written lbf-in) into the equivalent in foot-pounds (ft-lb). Both units describe the same physical quantity: a pound of force applied at a distance, the difference being only whether that distance is measured in inches or feet. Because a foot contains exactly twelve inches, the relationship between the two is fixed and never changes. You will run into this conversion constantly when a service manual quotes torque in one unit but your wrench is calibrated in the other.

Reach for this tool whenever you are tightening fasteners to spec and the numbers do not match your wrench. Spark plugs, valve-cover bolts, oil-pan bolts, and front wheel bearings are typically specified in inch-pounds, while lug nuts and suspension hardware are quoted in foot-pounds. A common real-world case: a manufacturer lists a spark plug at 150 in-lb, which is 12.5 ft-lb, or a GM plug at 132 in-lb, which is exactly 11 ft-lb. Converting first lets you confirm the figure is sensible before you set a click wrench and risk stripping a small bolt.

The math is straightforward: divide the inch-pound value by 12 to get foot-pounds. So 240 in-lb / 12 = 20 ft-lb, and 96 in-lb / 12 = 8 ft-lb. To go the other direction, multiply foot-pounds by 12. This converter applies that exact divisor, so the result carries no rounding error introduced by the unit change itself; any decimals you see come only from your original number. Enter whole numbers or decimals and the tool returns the precise foot-pound equivalent instantly.

Because the conversion is purely mathematical, accuracy here is exact rather than approximate, unlike conversions between unrelated systems. Everything runs locally in your browser, so the figures you type, often pulled from a repair manual or torque chart, are never uploaded to a server or stored. One practical caution: converting the number does not change which wrench you should use. A small in-lb spec is best set on an inch-pound wrench, since foot-pound wrenches are least accurate at the bottom of their range.

Frequently asked questions

What is the formula to convert inch-pounds to foot-pounds?

Divide the inch-pound value by 12. For example, 180 in-lb / 12 = 15 ft-lb. The divisor is exactly 12 because there are 12 inches in a foot.

Why is the conversion factor exactly 12?

Inch-pounds and foot-pounds use the same unit of force (the pound) and differ only in the distance unit. Since one foot equals exactly 12 inches, one foot-pound equals exactly 12 inch-pounds, making the conversion precise with no rounding.

Is a foot-pound bigger or smaller than an inch-pound?

A foot-pound is twelve times larger than an inch-pound. That means any value in foot-pounds will be a smaller number than the same torque expressed in inch-pounds.

My spec says 150 in-lb. What is that in foot-pounds?

150 in-lb divided by 12 equals 12.5 ft-lb. This is a typical spark plug torque, and it is usually best set with an inch-pound wrench since 12.5 ft-lb sits near the bottom of most foot-pound wrench ranges.

Does converting the units mean I can use either torque wrench?

No. The number is the same torque either way, but small specifications are more accurately set with an inch-pound wrench. Foot-pound wrenches lose accuracy at very low readings, so match the wrench to the size of the spec, not just the unit.

From our blog

Cooking Conversions Made Simple: Cups, Grams, and Why Your Scale Wins

By the Super Simple Digital Tools Team · Updated June 2026

Almost every cook hits the same wall eventually: a recipe you want to make is written in units your kitchen does not speak. Maybe it is an American cake recipe listing cups and sticks of butter, or a European one in grams and millilitres. The good news is that conversion is mostly arithmetic, and once you understand which numbers are fixed and which depend on the ingredient, you can adapt any recipe with confidence.

Start with the volume measures, because these never change. A teaspoon is a third of a tablespoon, a tablespoon is a sixteenth of a US cup, and a US cup is just under 237 millilitres. These ratios hold no matter what is being measured, whether it is water, oil or vanilla extract. So if a recipe wants a quarter cup of milk and you only have measuring spoons, you can confidently use four tablespoons. This is the easy, predictable half of cooking conversion.

The trickier half is moving between volume and weight. Grams and ounces measure mass, and mass depends on how densely an ingredient packs into a cup. This is why a single cup measurement can equal wildly different weights: roughly 120 grams for fluffy all-purpose flour but around 200 grams for granulated sugar, which packs tightly. A converter that ignores the ingredient and uses one fixed gram-per-cup figure will be wrong for almost everything, which is why selecting the actual ingredient matters so much.

Be aware that the cup itself is not universal. The US cup is about 240 millilitres, the metric cup used across Australia and New Zealand is 250 millilitres, and the historic UK imperial cup was larger still at about 284 millilitres. For a soup or a stew this rarely matters. For a delicate sponge or a bread dough, where the balance of flour to liquid is critical, using the wrong cup standard can leave you with a batter that is too wet or a cake that refuses to rise.

If you take one thing away, let it be this: weighing beats measuring by volume. Professional bakers work in grams precisely because a scale removes the guesswork of how firmly you packed the cup or whether the flour had settled. A converter is perfect for translating a recipe quickly and for everyday cooking, but when accuracy counts, convert the volume amounts to grams once, then weigh them. Your results will be far more consistent from one batch to the next.

  • Always choose the specific ingredient before converting cups to grams; flour, sugar and butter all weigh different amounts per cup.
  • Remember the core spoon ratios: 3 teaspoons make a tablespoon and 16 tablespoons make a US cup, so you can swap between them without a tool.
  • Check whether a recipe uses US (about 240 ml) or metric (250 ml) cups before baking, since the difference can affect rise and texture.
  • For the most reliable baking, convert your volume measurements to grams once and weigh the ingredients on a digital scale instead of scooping.

Read the full guide →

Tool by the Super Simple Digital Tools Team. Reviewed by our editorial team. Free to use, no signup required.

Related tools